LAPD Disclaimer

  • Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the monitor has approved them. We encourage you to express your opinions about current events through respectful and insightful discussion. The Department reserves the right to refuse to post those comments that contain inappropriate language and/or material. Additionally, hyper-links or E-mail addresses will not be posted. To report or help us solve a crime go to lapdonline.org. To commend an employee or report employee misconduct - click here.

LAPD Photos

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from lapdblog. Make your own badge here.

Translate


  • Disclaimer: The LAPDonline.org® website has made reasonable efforts to provide an accurate translation. However, no automated or computerized translation is perfect and is not intended to replace human or traditional translation methods. The official text is the English version of the LAPDonline.org® website. If any questions arise concerning the accuracy of the information presented by the translated version of the website, please refer to the English edition of the website, which is the official version.

Become a Fan

LAPD Blog RSS Feed

« 76-year old Man Missing | Main | Chief Bratton Addresses Video Clip »

November 09, 2006

Comments

It is fashionable and trendy to hold onto a mobile phone. I wonder how many school going kids would want to leave their mobile phones behind.

Chief Bratton,

I have a question. A day never goes by without hearing of robberies in which cellphone and other gadgets were stolen from a person. With today's technology, can we work on a program where once police are made aware of a robbery and a cellphone is stolen we can track and locate the robber? I am sure if the LAPD gets with every cellphone provider and aks their clients to sign a waiver that will give the police the right to track the cellphone after being stolen, you will be making plenty of arrests. It will be like LOJAK, the robber never know what hit them. There are plenty of excuses why it wont work..Privacy rights, cant track if the phone is off, bad reception, some are not GPS equipped so on....You can even pick and choose which ones you choose to track..Like if the crime does sound credible, several robberies in the area just occurred by the same described suspects, that way you don't have to chase down kids whos parents are just trying to locate them.. It can be made tamper proof. So if the city is serious in lowering crimes and make arrests of the repeat offenders in the city, you can make plenty of arrests which will put them away before they rob the 10 innocent persons. Assigning one liason officer to work with these companies will be off tremendously with the amout of arrest it will produce. It wont hurt trying it out.. I look forward in a response to this idea by the LAPD . Thank you for your time.

Frank,

Your idea certainly has merit and will be researched. Perhaps you have come up with a solution to this growning problem

Samantha/LT: This is already being done in high-profile crimes, i.e. kidnappings, commercial robberies, etc.

The problem lies with the cell phone carrier, not the Victim. The carriers create such a bureaucratic red-tape nightmare, that search warrant must be done in order to accomplish this task (even if the Victim consents to it).

Happy Cop,
Thank you for the information on Cell Phones, I'll pass all of the information on to someone to research.

This is really the kind of police department I want to work for.

How can this be?? The website says that crime is down??

The comments to this entry are closed.

Chief Charlie Beck

Text-A-Tip

WebTip


Nixle


April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

iWATCH